- British economist John Maynard Keynes is the founder of Keynesian economics.
- Keynesian economics argues that demand drives supply and that healthy economies spend or invest more than they save.
- To create jobs and boost consumer buying power during a recession, Keynes held that governments should increase spending, even if it means going into debt.
- Critics attack Keynesian economics for promoting deficit spending, stifling private investment, and causing inflation.
=====================
One media "fix" to the legacy of Keynesian economics is of the huge National Debt to which the United States is always on the brink of collapse into bankruptcy and inability to pay of even the interest on the debt. Massive efforts to divert public attention from this near fatal collapse of the US and it's currency leadership around the world (which is not something that is undesired but instead highly but secretly desired in order to bring into the world this chaos of economic failure of the US Government, which would enable a take-over by the fascist contingent --many of whom are heavily armed with assault rifles and the like)--but endless focus in the media upon #45 has made attention on this most urgent issue completely buried and obscured. If it wasn't Bill Clinton and his sexual escapades making headlines to obscure other trifles like wars and economic collapse, the formula to keep the "masses" occupied into focusing on other issues remains. But my point is Queen E--from all my encounters with people connected to the English Royalty (one of whom was poisoning me to death, stole ideas, and is behind the H-wood English-backed celebrities who have tortured and stolen ideas from me non-stop, all making open anti-Semitic Nazi statements about having me killed in concentration camps and all those other fascist statements). I take it then that they are merely emulating what they were trained and programmed to think and behave like coming from the top, the mentality trickling down like Keynesian economics, from whence comes my connection to the fiscal fascist policies which have helped to bring about our current near-fascist take-over of the United States. It's a very long take of economic disaster, which is elaborated upon by many a scholar and hinted at by Progressives and many others alike--hailed as stolid foundation for future politics by the likes of the fascist-take-over Party vying for complete take-over of elections committees and a future of their making, by-passing the US Constitution whenever advantage for power is possible. Keynes and his "trickle-down" economics. I believe this was extoled and brought forth originally by The English Crown, Queen E in particular as she probably condoned every policy that the US then welcomed in as their partnership in world domination ensures mutual economic stability (albeit non-parity in currency, so the English can stroll on into the US and purchase as much as they want, which they have done to the delight of the fascist contingent and their dumbed down minions in the US who latch onto every statement and believe in it, when they are instructed to do so. All "good" little programmed minions rewarded (Perhaps temporarily and fatally so).
-------------------
Yes dear readers, it is possible to predict something (for me) without using crutches such as tarot cards. I "felt" that this would happen and first it was her husband and then Her. I am neither happy nor sad about this passing (well, I am not neutral but I don't want to appear callous). My goal really is to see if Charles is going to continue the legacy of post WWII fascism (disguised as it so cleverly has been in the circles of concentric power trickling down from the top-to-the-bottom tiers of UK society. How they attack me whenever possible and all following the exact same protocols but not all have access to the most sophisticated mind control technologies, and who is controlling the lower and bottom tiers, I wonder when only they have use of these minute highly covert and sophisticated technologies at their immediate disposal? Rhetorical question, my dears reading this...).
----------------
But I did write this, it was at the beginning of this year, in January or just prior to the New Year. Where it is, I can't really bother to look up because I can't stand to see months and years of the same railings and rantings I have divulged in, in my endless years of attempting to garner sympathy. I realize that the thrashing torture victim is more of an entertainment spectacle than an object of pity, unless they are of the established bigot appearance which everyone is "supposed" to consider far more worthy of law and legal protection then their darker hue fellow human beings (which they dehumanize as often as possible, those who consider the law only and realistically established for their defense and counter-offensive tactics and the rest have no rights, as deemed by their creed and this terror system of systematic racism is surely assisting in this social engineering project of prison population culture/no rights for me and so, my writings have only amassed spectators and no protection, or so it seems. Hopefully more people of the oppressed layers of dehumanization will stop nearly worshipping their oppressors and finally begin to establish their real-life majority rule of equal protection under law and whatever else can come of stopping the mind programming into white supremacy that things like the media are endlessly thrusting out into the mental sphere atmosphere.
I think of the Queen of England and of the utter and in the highest circles, extending into the lower, of absolute racist Nazism and I do believe that this mentality and paradigm is a remnant of the complicit Royalty to the Nazi cause preceding and ever-present ever since--tricking down as it were. The "trickle-down" theory is of English origin in the form of John Maynard Keynes, which has brought about "Neo-liberal" economic policies and politics. I could write an essay on this subject and indeed a book but hacking and blocks are making it arduous to simply type this out. (Nota Bene): after I got up from this laptop, away from the brain-altering tech blasting my brain in front of this laptop screen--I "remembered" the name Prince Philip, husband to Queen Elizabeth. Whilst in front of this laptop his name completely escaped my awareness. Once up and away it came roaring into my consciousness from "memory retrieval" my brain compartmentalizes--this happens to frequently, almost for every post I can't "remember" how to spell, or names, or ideas and they all come back at odd moments while I am away from this laptop space. The WiFi doesn't have to be turned off for the effect and the memories blocked to resurface while I am in another physical location.--I just read the first sentence of this paragraph and saw that hackers had deleted parts of the post--"the queen and her utter.." and then there was a change of ideas -this was hacked, but I can't "remember" right now what I had originally written---I could add something but I leave it in just to make this point made about how discrediting the hacker tactics and attempts are. I can't "think" while I am writing and fighting to get past the obstructions of hackers blocking keyboard functioning--which is at 100% of the time obstruction while I type, and thinking is hindered at probably a 40% range of cognitive ability by their tech of torture/hate and discrimination.
No comments:
Post a Comment