On the making of solemn oaths of service to the US Constitution and to an entire country, and keeping them in ALL cases and situations. The Constitution of the United States oath ceremony is not just a promise made but broken on occasion or convenient with the title "good" appearing on the liars who are "fighting injustice" but helping to foment a greater Evil. So many politicians coming to teleport and assist in torturing and abusing and using and exploiting "Little 'ole ME", and how that oath is absolutely shattered once they see a discredited and poverty-stricken sick and begging torture victim asking for help, when they can join in with the terrorists when it's all concealed and they still prance around in the "good guys" garb and get deals and promotions out of helping to completely destroy the Constitution where it's supposed to really count.!!!// On liars as professional politicians. //Of the infamous January 6, 2020 Insurrection leaders, The Oath Keepers and the rally and cry to shed blood similar to "The Red Wedding", from Game of Thrones. What is "good" and what is "evil"? A copied YouTube comment section, 'Beyond Good and Evil' set of ponderings and philosophical questing.

 "The Red Wedding HD 1080 Game of Thrones". apockl. June 7, 2013.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here is a clip of the 3-hour Hearing where I believe James von Tatenhoven (right) testified that some of the rallying cries heard throughout the YouTube Kindom of "Right-wing extremists" (putting the term in quotes because although I think the term is correct, I am just safety tucking that labeling into someone else's categorization. I of course would call them other names more animalistic). Throughout the Kingdom of the bloodthirsty righteous on YouTube looking for Medieval War & Games, they cried, "Dude! Let this be a Red Wedding--it's gonna be a Red Wedding for sure Dude." and then more hawing and laughing ensued on the clip shown to demonstrate how this call for blood was part of a hilarious (ha ha ho ho) clip made in early January, 2020 by some "right wing extremist" YouTube commentator. Now, in this clip below, I forgot whether Mr. von Tatenhoven mentioned this or I heard it from another segment on the hearings, but I believe it is included here. I am tired from having been kept up all night and exhausted from healing and I don't want to waste more time re-watching the video I was glued to yesterday. This was by far one of the most revealing testimonies I had seen and the import was tremendous. 

This morning I thought of seeing exactly what the "Red Wedding" was all about besides the obvious, a kind of shot gun wedding that goes awry where the trigger is pulled. I watched the segment, obviously my body was shocked by all the killing and throat-slitting. I read some of the comments and got to this one I will post below, and then wrote a comment, and my mind traveled into the realm of what truly is beyond Nietzsche's concept of Good and Evil and how intertwined those concepts really are by those who consider oaths to be solemn and met with death if broken and those who are righteous and upstanding but break oaths at times when they want a more comfortable arrangement, always claiming they are "good" and doing the "right thing". Forgetting for that brief moment that in the eyes of those who are deadly serious about standing one's ground and keeping bonds of trust in oaths is more important than more shallow posturing for graceful "good" appearances.

"Capital Rioter and Former Oath Keeper Testify at Jan. 6 Hearing That Trump Radicalized Extremists". Democracy Now! July 13, 2022.

----------------------

This look into the voluminous import of both Beyond Good & Evil and keeping oaths and all those stark contrasts of black and white, here is a comment that spurred my reaction comment. It's all very brief, but then I got into deeper pondering later on and decided that this is a subject which is connected not only to religious belief but also to moral and societal standing. That this clip is only considered to be merely a "call to bloodshed" is a bit too shallow in interpretation. The person from the J-6 Committee who made the reference showed me absolutely no, zero moral standing and has attacked me in teleportation and is a breaker of the Oath of the Constitution that he claims he solemnly swore to uphold and protect. That also includes not participating in f-ing teleportation rape and torture theft and attempted murder by a gang of thugs celebrities whores and laughing and giggling alongside them, breaking every Constitutional Law but using this as a stepping-stone for a career ladder move. 

------------------

One commentator wrote in a thread: "I really think his, and the Stark family in general's biggest downfall is they're almost unbearably naive and honorable. I don't think the thought that something would go wrong ever crossed Robb's mind. Ned, Robb, and Jon all died because they did what they genuinely thought was right and didn't take into consideration how evil and cynical the world is. Easily, the best house in the show, they're all just good people."  

I replied to that comment:

I don't know the names of the characters, but the King sitting at the top of the carnage asked his wife, "Didn't you make a solemn oath to only allow your son to marry my daughter?". Thus, instead of being "good" or virtuous, the seemingly "good" and noble characters had the flaw of just kinda slipping in a few breaks of promises, but oaths broken are somethings that can be met with death as punishment for breaking. The sense of righteous "good" in the King slaying all these other people in the court, many of them "innocent"-not sure if they knew the oath was broken, not sure if they were gold-digger court players, as I have never watched GOT until now--this clip only because of the Oath Keeper's reference just made in the recent Hearings at the US Congress. "Good" is seemingly inter-mixed in this part of that series. Forcing one to keep one's oath was taken as a serious deed, and nothing to be undone. The King had his image to protect. The "Good" people you mention essentially lied, in other words or didn't negotiate a forgiveness or blessing to get out of the oath. The daughter of the King was innocent, or seemingly. They are all kind of Evil, those who died or remained.

Show less