Wednesday, February 9, 2022

"U.S. Civil War: The US-Russian Alliance that Saved the Union". When Russia was a true friend to Democracy and the United States, actually saving it from destruction and utter collapse. This is a (huge) "sidebar" to the history of the Civil War that I was never taught in school (nor were you, I would guess) however it remains critical to understanding my stance on the terrorism that confronts me *and you too*, notably from the many English who have joined lately into this terrorism against me utilizing hate and teleportation for their promotional greed agenda, but powered by those supporting the ultimate demise of real and true Democracy in the United States who unfortunately are of "American" birth--the actors in H-wood for example but the numbers of Americans who are not famous far exceed their representatives in H-wood--and this trickling down effect of the Royal Crown $ cascading to bribe, buy out and exert destructive influence remains a strategy that was employed much more openly and violently during the mid-latter 1800's and the pre-and then during the Civil War era--now clandestine as "friendly" allies and kisses and hugs in the parties of H-wood and extending into political leadership and their background of study and being influenced in England and France-- and the forces that control those who are controlled and are vying for power under this hate contract using this torture protocol and terrorist technology.

 U.S. Civil War: The US-Russian Alliance that Saved the Union





*Please note that I just rewrote the first paragraph to the below post--my thoughts--which were rewritten by terrorist hackers so badly I could only understand what was written because I had attempted to write it only a few minutes before. It would seem that this post will likewise be partially deleted and rewritten after I fight the malware blocking typing functions and my brain under severe attack so it's very hard to access my cognitive abilities to the fullest (much is being blocked in my critical thinking capabilities)

It was Russia under Tsar Alexander II which helped save the Union during the American Civil War. It was Britain and France who were enemies of American Democracy and of the United States. It was our current NATO "allies" which were trying to establish a complete break-up of the United States in what became an alliance set about to enflame the conflagration of the Civil War in typical "divide and conquer" strategy, fully supporting the Confederacy.

The former anti-Democratic alliances remain today as they were in 1965; as a force for covertly pushing destruction of the United States and a take-over of all prominent positions (and ownership) through subterfuge, infiltration and sabotage for a modern Civil War in the United States (the exception to the 1861 Russian intervention in all this historical review is the lack of a Russian leadership a la Tsar Alexander II, who was assassinated by what could be considered pre-Bolshevik forces in 1881):

"The big issue was always a British-French attack on the United States to preserve the Confederate States of America. This is certainly how Union and Confederate leaders viewed the matter, and how some important people in London, St. Petersburg, Paris, and Berlin did as well.....In 1865, the United States was friendly to Russia and Prussia, and resentful and suspicious in regard to Britain and France, whose governments had sympathized with and supported the Confederacy....It is hardly too much to say that the future of the world as we know it was at stake. A conflict between Great Britain and America would have crushed all hope of the mutual understanding and growing collaboration which led up to the practical alliance of 1917-18, and the outright alliance which began in 1941. It would have made vastly more difficult if not impossible the coalition which defeated the Central Powers in the First World War, struck down Nazi tyranny in the Second World War, and established the unbreakable front of Western freedom against Communism. Anglo-French intervention in the American conflict would probably have confirmed the splitting and consequent weakening of the United States; might have given French power in Mexico a long lease, with the ruin of the Monroe Doctrine; and would perhaps have led to the Northern conquest of Canada. The forces of political liberalism in the modern world would have received a disastrous setback. No battle, not Gettysburg, not the Wilderness, was more important than the context waged in the diplomatic arena and the forum of public opinion. The popular conception of this contest is at some points erroneous, and at a few grossly fallacious…. (Nevins II, 242)....The Threat of British Intervention

The two great interlocutors of Union foreign policy were Great Britain and Russia, and the geopolitical vicissitudes of the twentieth century tended to distort perceptions of both, minimizing the importance of both British threat and Russian friendship.... London even considered ways to foment secession in Maine. Bombarding and burning both Boston and New York was actively considered as a contingency; it was concluded that the reduction of Boston would be very difficult because of the channels and forts; New York was seen as more vulnerable, especially to a surprise attack. An Admiralty hydrographer saw New York City as “the true heart of [US] commerce, — the centre of …maritime resources; to strike her would be to paralyse all the limbs.” (Bourne 240)"

------------------------

These foreign forces have not stopped their quest to dissolve the United States, bring into their fold Americans who cannot tolerate a country with values that truly embrace equality of races, with that traditional backlash to all the attempts to create a more equitable society for all involved and not just a coterie of cronyism exerting suppression over the vast majority. That is the attempt I have personally been afflicted by for over a decade and much longer by the English and of course their larger Euro-p-a partners who act like one huge alliance in the terrorist pursuits of domination, Imperialism and Conquest.

To revert the United States back to it's former role as a colonized subject of the Crown has already been greatly achieved just via corporate interests and the "Dark Money" forces that no one still is able to quite locate in the media nor can the politicians who complain about it actually describe in detail exactly who or what is responsible. Yet I have written of it and I am silenced. I write of it now to the dark matter of the universe of the internet with all it's black holes waiting to try to drag me into their negative vortexes as part of the overall scheme of utter devouring of anything that doesn't suit their dark universe of compression and stagnation for the solidity of their empire acquisition.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I will expose the lies and corruption of what Social Security refuses to do BY LAW which is to send me information on benefits reinstatement and the answer as to how benefits can be reinstated. Technically, the Law states: I Legal Statutes and Requirements for Written Notice Under federal law, the SSA is strictly required to provide written notice whenever they make a "determination" that affects your benefits. This is rooted in the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). General Requirement for Written Notice ( 20 20 CFR 404.904 404.904 and 416.1404 416.1404): The law states that the SSA must mail a written notice of the "initial determination" to you at your last known address. This notice must state: The specific reasons for the determination. The effective date of the change. Your right to a reconsideration or appeal. Notice of Planned Action ( 20 20 CFR 416.1336 416.1336): For SSI (Supplemental Security Income), the SSA is required to send a "Notice of Planned Action" before they stop, suspend, or reduce your payments. This notice must explain the "why" in enough detail that you can choose to contest it. The "Goldberg v. Kelly" Standard: This landmark Supreme Court case established that because government benefits are a form of property, the government cannot take them away without "Due Process." This means they must provide a clear, written explanation and an opportunity for a hearing before the benefits are terminated.//A more polished AI version of my last post. How they are illegally blocking me from reinstatement of my SSI Disability Benefits, beyond blocking all mail and emails and hacking into my computer with no way for me to resolve any of this. My family is a billion percent instigators of this although they are professionals and lawyers they probably set this up with all illegality so they can continue to profit off selling me as a trafficking sex and murder victim for their endless upgrade in wealth and "status" as "Jews" with nazi spouses and children (it's the same pattern throughout the Jewish diaspora).