Manufacturing Consent (Chomsky, video below). Mind-to-gonad control in reputable news sources: Foreign-owned and controlled Wall Street Journal's owner Rupert Murdoch, The purveyor and former owner of the British tabloid The Sun, which equates to "Page 3" topless women in The Sun is now entertaining the masses with info-entrainment control in The Wall Street Journal.

LET IT GO? DISNEY PRINCESS CULTURE ISN'T TOXIC, STUDY FINDS.  

*Nota Bene: I just had to rewrite the first paragraph for the 3rd time due to hacking deletions after publishing this post. I have only read the first paragraph, which took some time to write out as hacking and keyboard malfunctioning is rife (as always when I write or use any laptop around the world). I copied and pasted this post onto my blogger page and had to rewrite the title of the Chomsky video below 5 times because hackers inserted some malware that deleted parts of the title as I was writing it. I can only imagine that much has been changed, deleted, punctuation as always deleted to create run-on sentences, etc etc. I can't go through all of this post for the 3rd time to rewrite so I have only tried to re-edit the first paragraph.

----------

The WSJ: Bought-out by Rupert Murdoch shortly after the WSJ reporting team had won the Pulizer Price for the reporting on the September, 11 terrorist attacks on the WTC. The reputable and "respectable" Rupert Murdoch newspaper owned by Australian mogul--Murdoch, who formerly owned Brit tabloid The Sun which heralded the famous "Page 3" of a topless female as one of the prime selling points for the daily pulp commuter titillation street rag crowd and the beer, "football", hooligan, snooker, porno fans---has also had his American highly "respectable" newspaper the Wall Street Journal publish a "study" from a group of "researchers" about how Disney's "Princess Culture" is not "toxic".

Oddly but not surprisingly, this reputable newspaper continues the tradition of a topless tabloid street rag by insulting the intelligence of the reader or assuming that a less-than sophomoric level of education prevails in the readership; does not deign to "bore" the readers with such unnecessary trivia such as which institution has conducted the "study" and which "researchers" claimed that this "5-year" study was firmly in the pocket of Disney investors vying for a positive result to their ongoing Princess culture themed (likely) billion-dollar industry.

So much for scientific methodology and accuracy in reporting and detail for an informed public to also check on the test or on which institution conducted this "study" or which participants and how many were chosen--and were they randomly chosen or not?

I have not subscribed to the WSJ so I have not gotten into the "meat" of the article. I will continue to try to look up a "free" online source for this but so far have no luck.

-----------

"'Page 3 would be best thing my son could see in The Sun'."  BBC News. January 20, 2015.

----------------------------

"In-Depth: BYU study explores princess culture & toxic masculinity".  Fox News Utah. July 30, 2021.

On YouTube I discovered a slightly different theme but it was posted within this last week, which would coincide with the "study" that "researchers" spent "5 years" conducting--(quoted from WSJ introductory "free" few first paragraphs from article above). The emphasis shifts from Princess Culture affecting females to the male "toxic" inculturation, with lessor influence on the female portion of the study. The Fox News clips details that all these children exposed to the new and vamped-up more aggressive tomboy Princess culture on modern Disney movies are more apt to become enculturated into "Progressive" party lines, with men having "less toxic masculinity" if they watch these Princess-themed Disney movies. It all sounds so healthy and responsible and modern and well-informed. The use of the scholarly term, "hegemonic masculinity" is self-described but this institute must delineate what that means. Male domination in other words. Watching Disney Princess movies is supposed to, according to this research, unravel the male domination paradigm that these celebrities are working and these organizations of entertainment are operating to deconstruct oh how hard they are working to be woke and hip and feminist. Unless, of course, the actors or investors or share-holders who are also celebrities playing these roles want a huge multi-million dollar deal by participating in rape and torture using mind control teleportation imposed upon me--which many a celebrity who has made movies (one in particular was a theme stolen from myh writing based on Andrea Dworkin's "Woman-Hating" book, the Sleeping Beauty theme that has enabled a vicious racist rapist female to be portrayed as having a most maladapted hypocritical stance towards rape culture which of course she firmly conforms to all the toxic masculinity possible in the privacy of this terror operation inflicting non-stop rape and violence upon me. But oh well--Disney is "promoting" feminism and this "institute" researched how watching these Disney movies played by rapist enablers and paid for by Disney executives who hire and produce all who rape and torture me according to the backlash against feminism--it's all put out by people like Rupert Murdoch in the now post-Page 3 addition to the tabloid marvel universe of news reportage (plus Fox News of course, reliable and not sexist but just ignore all the claims of rape and abuse of women at Fox News).

---------------

 "Noam Chomsky's Advice: Learn to Chose the Truth."  Through Conversations Podcast. April 24, 2021.

With subliminal mind control technologies that remain a "silenced" topic in mainstream news sources (exempting Alex Jones, who is so hysterically-inclined that it's very hard to take his rantings seriously). As for gang stalking activities, these are the covert arms of the State of repression that also remain silenced except for the rantings of Jones and a few YouTubers who do not get real notice. A few news clips regarding these issues are scattered through searches but very rare in quantity and low in information and quality. These are the methods of the silencing of dissent that abound and remain as the "torture chamber" channels through which questioning and going against is thwarted.